This site own header is a good example, too, only a lot simpler and cleverer than this acrobatic folly :) Another real world example may be to mark some unpublished posts for admin where the huge 72px “UNPUBLISHED” word is rendered absolutely underneath the post contents.

With the lack of font embedding, shall I think this is a low-tech approach against the Scalable Inman Flash Replacement (sIFR) technology? Yet, very inspiring, thanks.

Snap! Nice bit of typographical trickery. Enjoyed the article. Thank you!

Um. Doesn’t look like your reference image in any of my browsers, Safari included:

http://informationage.co.nz/temp/folly.png

Tested in newest public versions of IE, FF, Opera, Safari, Chrome on 32 bit Vista

Doesn’t look like your reference image in any of my browsers

You may just need to do a hard reload to make sure you have the latest version of this site’s stylesheets.

One can learn more from this little typographic eye candy than from some heavy CSS books on Web Typography.
Thanks, Jon, you didn’t disappoint—rocking type on Web, as usual :)

That’s great! I also experimented with something similar to this and must say it does get confusing at first, but once you wrap your head around it it becomes really easy to understand. Great job!

Looks fine for me on first load, running firefox in leopard.

So this is very impressive, a great example of some useful practices, and something I might try sometime. But I wonder – do you think that this has any real world application? There’s all the trouble of doing something like this, or you could just use an image replacement. You could even remove all of the nested spans if you did that.

This is lovely! Thank you for sharing.

@Andrew first thing that comes to mind is that if it were an image you wouldn’t be able to select it to copy-paste it into a text editor.

Besides, it IS a folly :)

Folly indeed.

Watch out for singing vikings when writing your rules
(span span span span…)

It’s quite nice, but it makes it pretty unreadable. If you didn’t know what the title of this site was before you saw that, you wouldn’t have a clue what it was supposed to say.

To me, that could say either ’42 to impress your ways friends’ or ’42 to impress ways your friends’

Fantastic tutorial, Jon!

@ Andrew: I think Jon’s personal site demonstrates that this does have real-world application. :)

Great article as always mate. 100% behind you regarding us designers/developers improving web typography.

I was shocked to read from your bio that you have left Gr0w Collective. A great asset lost but one gained at OmniTI.

Jon, remarkable article. Just like your logo made a remarkable impression on me when I first saw it a few weeks ago.

One might argue that some follys have more than just “decoration” purposes since they send an actual, vivid message. This one says: You care about typography. Right off the bat.

Great work. Thanks for sharing the technicalities of this with us. Although, I hope you’re prepared to start seeing follys like this throughout the web. I think you can just see them as tributes to the great piece of web-art that is your logo.

Congrats & thanks.

Is there any reason you used nested spans rather successive spans with classes?

@Andrew, @Elliot: I think the trouble is that there is no longer a real-world application – if I saw a site carrying a header like this, I’d immediately be thinking ‘Ah, that’s from Jon Tan’s site’ :)

So Andrew, there probably isn’t a direct real-world application of this tutorial. But that’s really not the point! This tutorial isn’t something to be taken directly and reproduced, but rather an insight into a different way of thinking about how type can be manipulated with CSS rules. It’s a primer which shows that you don’t necessarily have to think about formatting text in paragraphs or even words, but can really deconstruct it and do whatever you like. The end result of this tutorial and a bit of careful thinking about the type in your life could easily look very different – but no less special!

Take care, Andi

Quite impressive indeed. Its great to see all what people do with CSS. Really nice article and your logo is just kick ass

Super! You got me triggered to try it out immediately. I might just have created a new header for my website.

Thanks!

Friggin’ sweet. It’s more simple than it appears initially, but it’s still not an exercise for the faint of heart. Very cool stuff Jon – thanks for sharing!

@Jon I guess that depends what your definition of awkward is. I’d prefer:

<span class=“2”>2</span><span class=“4”>4</span> <span class=“w”>w</span><span class=“a”>a</span><span class=“y”>y</span><span class=“s”>s</span>

…as being more readable and workable. But maybe that’s just me.

You could also then use the nth-child CSS selector (although that only works in more advanced browsers).

Awesome, I just downloaded safari for windows so I could experience typographical bliss for a while.

Very cool

Jeff, Prisca, Vivien, Patrick, Vasily, Matijs, Elliot, André, Andi, Johns: Thanks for all the kind words, guys; I very much appreciate them.

Andrew: An image replacement wouldn’t be near as much fun. :) In some ways, the folly is just an extension of the very real-world and useful h1 at Happy Cog , which breaks up the copy into logical chunks. This example is just an extreme version, evolved from one I did in 2006.

Steve: You could say that Grow has been assimilated into the OmniTI borg – much of what we were is being ported there.

Frankie: Classes would make it the HTML even more awkward than it already is. You could use sequential elements with adjacent sibling selectors if they had full historical support. In fact, child selectors could also be useful, too. Descendant selectors require nesting.

Chris: Typography is about legibility, but not always. This is one of those times.