Brian Suda 29 December 2010 J. RYAN STINNETT, you are right. It seems to be a typo that made it pretty far. I have updated the text so the function is 114 not 144. Thanks for that catch, with enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow.
J. RYAN STINNETT, you are right. It seems to be a typo that made it pretty far. I have updated the text so the function is 114 not 144. Thanks for that catch, with enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow.