Jump to content
@ Ben & Botclock: What Drew said.
@ Kaske: Again… what Drew said.
@ Jack I’ve found this problem too. I might be wrong but I think it’s due to the not-quite-perfect implementation, but if anyone knows of a fix, please feel free to jump in!
@ Drew: Cheers for sticking up for the progressive enhancement and list-based markup! You said it better than I ever could have. And, in hindsight, I think you’re right about how it should’ve been a <ol> rather than a <ul>. Good call.